вЂњThe designers of Bookerly font have created a useful visual showing the organic structure of the font. Piotr Kowalczyk from В praised more than the fontвЂ™s visual appeal, citing BookerlyвЂ™s readability as one of its best features. And in my testing, I thought it was even more pleasant than Palatino, the typeface I previously used on my Kindle.вЂќ вЂњBookerly even includes some lovely ligatures that makes reading on the Kindle feel more like printed typography, like the way the terminal on a lowercase вЂfвЂ™ will replace the title on the lower case вЂiвЂ™, if they are right next to each other,вЂќ he adds. вЂњRead Bookerly at much larger font sizes, and some of the fonts delicate touches are allowed to shine: for example, the delicate way the upper arm almost licks the stem of the lower case вЂkвЂ™,вЂќ he writes in Co.Design. Having been purpose-built for on-screen display, one would think that Bookerly is the easy choice for e-book enthusiasts.Дesign writer John Brownlee certainly agrees.

(Source: ) What People Are Saying About It It introduces a lighter, more graceful look and outperforms other digital reading fonts to help you read faster with less eyestrain.вЂќ вЂњWarm and contemporary, Bookerly is inspired by the artistry of the best fonts in modern print books but is hand-crafted for great readability at any size. HereвЂ™s what the companyвЂ™s marketing people have to say about the font: So invested were Amazon in their creation that the font has replaced Caecilia as the default option in all their future devices. So, herewith then, a breakdown of each font available to most e-book users, along with their respective benefits and drawbacks, as defined by fellow e-book enthusiasts.Дesigned in 2015 by independent font foundry Dalton MaagВ exclusively for the Amazon Kindle, Bookerly is the youngest font on our list. The only other option was to take the exact opposite approach: Find out what the people on the internet have to say.

Well, so much for the вЂњscientific methodвЂќ then. вЂњI recently read nearly every important book, and many of the important papers, on the study of legibility from 1905 to the presentвЂ¦.nearly all the good ones say that it is very difficult or nearly impossible to find statistically significant differences in intrinsic legibility between common typefaces read at common sizes and normal distances,вЂќ he said in an academic text he published in 2012. These suspicions were confirmed when we stumbled across this quote from notable typeface historian and designer Charles Bigelow: Our initial suspicion was that this might prove to be a difficult topic to research since what determines an ideal reading experience for one person may be very different to anotherвЂ™s. This made us wonder whether there is such a thing as an objectively вЂњbetterвЂќ font for reading an e-book in. Collectively the team at Edition Guard have lost count of the number of times we selected a new font for our e-book readers, with the most popular justification for doing so being: вЂњI remembered that I could.вЂќ However, with the number of options for customization that we have, often comes the temptation to customize simply for the sake of it. In the age of digital content, customization has become so ubiquitous that most of us have forgotten a time where there was only one way to interact with written information: the way the publisher intended.ДЇrom simple tweaks, like setting your browserвЂ™s zoom-level, to more granular ones like your e-book readerвЂ™s text alignment and font, creating your вЂњidealвЂќ reading experience is just a view clicks or taps away. But I for one welcome my new font overlord.ItвЂ™s easy for readers to take the number of choices we take for granted. I realize most people don't care about fonts only the meaning of what is written. Bookerly is almost like a perfect cipher for my eyes: it imparts nothing of its own, just the meaning of what is written. Also, Literata's italics are too weird and overdone.

Why not Literata? It is almost as good, but with its overdone embellishments at the end of letters like 'r' or 'f' it too distracts my eye a bit more than Bookerly. Bookerly is to my eye the perfect happy medium. But now that my eye has gotten used to Bookerly, they also distract my eye too much, this time by being too heavy, too stodgy. For a while I read exclusively with the almost-monospace fonts on my Kobo: Caecilia, Kobo Nickel and Amasis. I can't read with regular proportional fonts anymore - my eye simply gets too distracted by the busyness of a stroke that constantly changes its width that much. It occupies the perfect middle ground between traditional proportional fonts like Time New Roman and Georgia and almost-monospace fonts like Caecilia and Kobo Nickel.

I use it exclusively now, for everything I read.

Kindle bookerly font